Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Cancellation of GST registration ab initio with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 violated principles of natural justice as Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not specify any reason or provision allegedly violated by petitioner. SCN failed to propose cancellation with retrospective effect. SCN bereft of reasons, failing to meet standards required for a show cause notice to enable meaningful response. Order dated 16.06.2020 cancelling petitioner's GST registration lacked reasons, merely referring to SCN and non-existent reply. Order directed to take effect from SCN date 29.05.2020, not ab initio.
Cancellation of GST registration ab initio with retrospective effect from 01.07.2017 violated principles of natural justice as Show Cause Notice (SCN) did not specify any reason or provision allegedly violated by petitioner. SCN failed to propose cancellation with retrospective effect. SCN bereft of reasons, failing to meet standards required for a show cause notice to enable meaningful response. Order dated 16.06.2020 cancelling petitioner's GST registration lacked reasons, merely referring to SCN and non-existent reply. Order directed to take effect from SCN date 29.05.2020, not ab initio.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.