Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Separate penalty on partner and firm barred for the same contravention; admission supported false declaration penalty but amount was reduced.
    Show cause notice and timely adjudication requirements invalidated customs recovery after a decades-long delay and excess demand.
    Classification of automatic soap dispensers turns on dispersing versus spraying, with Chapter 8424 applying to foam dispensing.
    Mandatory appeal limitation under customs law bars condonation beyond the statutory outer limit and excludes the Limitation Act.
    Provisional release conditions must be proportionate; CESTAT reduced onerous bank guarantees while retaining full-value bonds
    Reduced penalty under Section 114A cannot be extended to Section 112(ii) customs penalties; matter remanded for redetermination.
    Natural justice bars fraud classification based on undisclosed material and a non-speaking order; notice and order quashed.
    Post-petition transfer validation under winding-up law upheld for a bona fide transaction benefiting creditors and lacking fraud.
    Section 244 waiver threshold upheld where prima facie oppression, mismanagement, and articles violations supported the petition.
    Section 7 insolvency cannot be used for coercive recovery where a quadripartite transaction is predominantly contractual.
    Limitation under Section 14 extends to prior IBC proceedings barred by pre-existing dispute, keeping the civil suit timely.
    Limitation under insolvency appeals starts from open-court pronouncement, with no condonation beyond the statutory outer limit.
    Project completion and CoC approval in insolvency: NCLAT rejects one promoter proposal, permits another subject to creditor consent.
    FEMA export proceeds and hearsay evidence defeated the commission-related contravention in independent enforcement proceedings.
    FEMA reporting compliance: timely FC-GPR filing with the authorised dealer defeated the penalty where bank delay caused transmission lapse.
    Corporate guarantee without consideration is not taxable as a supply of service, though the GST valuation challenge failed.
    GST appeal limitation and writ condonation fail where no exceptional circumstances justify delay
    Provisional attachment and parallel proceedings: writ challenge failed for lack of foundational facts and statutory post-decisional remedy.
    Alternative remedy and disputed facts led the High Court to decline writ interference in an input tax credit matter.
    Personal hearing requirement under GST natural justice led to quashing of an ex parte assessment order
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

The bogus transactions are a camouflage and dishonest attempt to...

Revenue's Appeal Upheld: AO to Assess Bogus Transactions at 12.5% Annually After CIT(A) Incorrectly Reduced Rate.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax August 10, 2024 Case Laws HC
The bogus transactions are a camouflage and dishonest attempt to avoid tax, resulting in addition to the assessee's income. The AO's approach should be well-considered, adhering to lawful norms and principles. If transactions are found bogus, they must be discarded by making appropriate permissible additions. The CIT(A) erred in reducing the gross profit returned by the assessee from 12% to 4.74%, as it had no bearing on purchases made by procuring bills to save VAT. The revenue's appeal was allowed, directing the AO to assess income from such transactions at 12.5% in each assessment year on the purchases made. The assessee accepted this finding as beneficial. If authorities view purchases as questionable or bogus, they must undertake necessary inquiries, including procuring information from other departments, to ascertain correct facts and bring such transactions to tax to prevent tax evasion and ensure real income is taxed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax