Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Onus on petitioner partnership firm to show unexplained investment and expenditure belonged to partners. No records showing partners had substantial income to lend Rs. 1.01 crore. Firm had rental income used for maintenance. No infirmity in impugned order rejecting petition u/s 264. Objection on non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) within 6 months not countenanced as not raised earlier. Section 292BB deems notice valid if assessee participated in proceedings, except if no notice issued. Explanatory Note to Finance Act, 2008 clarifies legal fiction inapplicable if objection not raised before assessment completion. Petition dismissed.
Onus on petitioner partnership firm to show unexplained investment and expenditure belonged to partners. No records showing partners had substantial income to lend Rs. 1.01 crore. Firm had rental income used for maintenance. No infirmity in impugned order rejecting petition u/s 264. Objection on non-issuance of notice u/s 143(2) within 6 months not countenanced as not raised earlier. Section 292BB deems notice valid if assessee participated in proceedings, except if no notice issued. Explanatory Note to Finance Act, 2008 clarifies legal fiction inapplicable if objection not raised before assessment completion. Petition dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
