Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an addition cannot be made solely based on the DVO's valuation report. The land-locked issue was duly considered by both the DVO and independent valuer during property valuation. The impugned lands were land-locked properties, and the independent valuer considered the market value. The Department Representative did not submit any contrary judgment or make a strong argument against the facts cited by the assessee. After considering the different valuation reports, the independent valuer's valuation was accepted, and the land's market value was confirmed. Consequently, the addition made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was quashed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an addition cannot be made solely based on the DVO's valuation report. The land-locked issue was duly considered by both the DVO and independent valuer during property valuation. The impugned lands were land-locked properties, and the independent valuer considered the market value. The Department Representative did not submit any contrary judgment or make a strong argument against the facts cited by the assessee. After considering the different valuation reports, the independent valuer's valuation was accepted, and the land's market value was confirmed. Consequently, the addition made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was quashed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
