Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an addition cannot be made solely based on the DVO's valuation report. The land-locked issue was duly considered by both the DVO and independent valuer during property valuation. The impugned lands were land-locked properties, and the independent valuer considered the market value. The Department Representative did not submit any contrary judgment or make a strong argument against the facts cited by the assessee. After considering the different valuation reports, the independent valuer's valuation was accepted, and the land's market value was confirmed. Consequently, the addition made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was quashed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an addition cannot be made solely based on the DVO's valuation report. The land-locked issue was duly considered by both the DVO and independent valuer during property valuation. The impugned lands were land-locked properties, and the independent valuer considered the market value. The Department Representative did not submit any contrary judgment or make a strong argument against the facts cited by the assessee. After considering the different valuation reports, the independent valuer's valuation was accepted, and the land's market value was confirmed. Consequently, the addition made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was quashed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
