Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an addition cannot be made solely based on the DVO's valuation report. The land-locked issue was duly considered by both the DVO and independent valuer during property valuation. The impugned lands were land-locked properties, and the independent valuer considered the market value. The Department Representative did not submit any contrary judgment or make a strong argument against the facts cited by the assessee. After considering the different valuation reports, the independent valuer's valuation was accepted, and the land's market value was confirmed. Consequently, the addition made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was quashed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an addition cannot be made solely based on the DVO's valuation report. The land-locked issue was duly considered by both the DVO and independent valuer during property valuation. The impugned lands were land-locked properties, and the independent valuer considered the market value. The Department Representative did not submit any contrary judgment or make a strong argument against the facts cited by the assessee. After considering the different valuation reports, the independent valuer's valuation was accepted, and the land's market value was confirmed. Consequently, the addition made by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) was quashed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
