Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The settlement consideration received by the assessee for relinquishing the right to seek registration of sweat equity shares, after cessation of employment, cannot be treated as 'profits in lieu of salary' u/s 17(3) of the Income Tax Act. The consideration was for unconditional relinquishment of the right to enforce registration of shares and not connected with termination of employment or modification of service terms. The Tribunal erred in segregating the consideration into 'capital gains' and 'salaries' components. The entire consideration is to be treated as 'capital gains' and not 'profits in lieu of salary'. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and answered the question of law in favor of the assessee.
The settlement consideration received by the assessee for relinquishing the right to seek registration of sweat equity shares, after cessation of employment, cannot be treated as 'profits in lieu of salary' u/s 17(3) of the Income Tax Act. The consideration was for unconditional relinquishment of the right to enforce registration of shares and not connected with termination of employment or modification of service terms. The Tribunal erred in segregating the consideration into 'capital gains' and 'salaries' components. The entire consideration is to be treated as 'capital gains' and not 'profits in lieu of salary'. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and answered the question of law in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.