Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded matter to verify unjust enrichment after holding appellant eligible for exemption. Original authority determined duty element not passed on. Appellant ineligible for interest from date of original refund claim filing. For periods without show cause notice, refund claims filed later. Appellant eligible for interest on delayed refund payment from date after 3 months of Order-in-Appeal allowing exemption, as per Section 11BB of Central Excise Act.
Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded matter to verify unjust enrichment after holding appellant eligible for exemption. Original authority determined duty element not passed on. Appellant ineligible for interest from date of original refund claim filing. For periods without show cause notice, refund claims filed later. Appellant eligible for interest on delayed refund payment from date after 3 months of Order-in-Appeal allowing exemption, as per Section 11BB of Central Excise Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
