Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded matter to verify unjust enrichment after holding appellant eligible for exemption. Original authority determined duty element not passed on. Appellant ineligible for interest from date of original refund claim filing. For periods without show cause notice, refund claims filed later. Appellant eligible for interest on delayed refund payment from date after 3 months of Order-in-Appeal allowing exemption, as per Section 11BB of Central Excise Act.
Appellant filed refund claim which was initially rejected by original authority on grounds of ineligibility for exemption notification. Commissioner (Appeals) remanded matter to verify unjust enrichment after holding appellant eligible for exemption. Original authority determined duty element not passed on. Appellant ineligible for interest from date of original refund claim filing. For periods without show cause notice, refund claims filed later. Appellant eligible for interest on delayed refund payment from date after 3 months of Order-in-Appeal allowing exemption, as per Section 11BB of Central Excise Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
