Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Blacklisting viewed as drastic remedy, orders subjected to rigorous scrutiny. Objective satisfaction required for disability created by blacklisting order. Comprehensive guidelines for debarment issued to protect public interest from non-responsible, dishonest, or illegal conduct contractors. Blacklisting debarment from dealings with concerned employer and other entities. Appellant paid Rs. 3,71,96,265 though outstanding Rs. 14,63,24,727 per Corporation. Issues between parties regarding reciprocal obligations in bid document from inception. Impugned judgment set aside, appeal allowed.
Blacklisting viewed as drastic remedy, orders subjected to rigorous scrutiny. Objective satisfaction required for disability created by blacklisting order. Comprehensive guidelines for debarment issued to protect public interest from non-responsible, dishonest, or illegal conduct contractors. Blacklisting debarment from dealings with concerned employer and other entities. Appellant paid Rs. 3,71,96,265 though outstanding Rs. 14,63,24,727 per Corporation. Issues between parties regarding reciprocal obligations in bid document from inception. Impugned judgment set aside, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
