Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
121 to 140 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to delay of 2 days beyond the 60-day statutory limit u/s 54(7) of the Act. Court held that the term "shall" in the section is directory, not mandatory, considering the availability of interest on delayed refunds u/s 56. Rigid adherence to the time limit would not serve the legislative intent. The impugned orders were deemed well-reasoned, with no procedural flaws or legal violations. Petitioner failed to show any merit for interference. High Court dismissed the application, finding no grounds for intervention.
Rejection of refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to delay of 2 days beyond the 60-day statutory limit u/s 54(7) of the Act. Court held that the term "shall" in the section is directory, not mandatory, considering the availability of interest on delayed refunds u/s 56. Rigid adherence to the time limit would not serve the legislative intent. The impugned orders were deemed well-reasoned, with no procedural flaws or legal violations. Petitioner failed to show any merit for interference. High Court dismissed the application, finding no grounds for intervention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
