Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4784
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95673 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved reimbursement of expenses u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, concerning payments made for services rendered outside India. The payments to various entities were found to fall under exclusionary provisions of Section 9(1)(vii)(b), as they were for earning income from a source outside India. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) was deemed unwarranted and ordered to be deleted. Transactions with Carnegie Mellon University, Call Centre School LLC, APM Group, British Computer Society, RADTAC, and an individual for professional services were similarly analyzed and disallowances were overturned, citing legal provisions and tax residency status. The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in all instances.
The case involved reimbursement of expenses u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, concerning payments made for services rendered outside India. The payments to various entities were found to fall under exclusionary provisions of Section 9(1)(vii)(b), as they were for earning income from a source outside India. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) was deemed unwarranted and ordered to be deleted. Transactions with Carnegie Mellon University, Call Centre School LLC, APM Group, British Computer Society, RADTAC, and an individual for professional services were similarly analyzed and disallowances were overturned, citing legal provisions and tax residency status. The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in all instances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4784
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
