Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The case involved reimbursement of expenses u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, concerning payments made for services rendered outside India. The payments to various entities were found to fall under exclusionary provisions of Section 9(1)(vii)(b), as they were for earning income from a source outside India. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) was deemed unwarranted and ordered to be deleted. Transactions with Carnegie Mellon University, Call Centre School LLC, APM Group, British Computer Society, RADTAC, and an individual for professional services were similarly analyzed and disallowances were overturned, citing legal provisions and tax residency status. The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in all instances.
The case involved reimbursement of expenses u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, concerning payments made for services rendered outside India. The payments to various entities were found to fall under exclusionary provisions of Section 9(1)(vii)(b), as they were for earning income from a source outside India. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) was deemed unwarranted and ordered to be deleted. Transactions with Carnegie Mellon University, Call Centre School LLC, APM Group, British Computer Society, RADTAC, and an individual for professional services were similarly analyzed and disallowances were overturned, citing legal provisions and tax residency status. The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in all instances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
