Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The case involved reimbursement of expenses u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, concerning payments made for services rendered outside India. The payments to various entities were found to fall under exclusionary provisions of Section 9(1)(vii)(b), as they were for earning income from a source outside India. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) was deemed unwarranted and ordered to be deleted. Transactions with Carnegie Mellon University, Call Centre School LLC, APM Group, British Computer Society, RADTAC, and an individual for professional services were similarly analyzed and disallowances were overturned, citing legal provisions and tax residency status. The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in all instances.
The case involved reimbursement of expenses u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, concerning payments made for services rendered outside India. The payments to various entities were found to fall under exclusionary provisions of Section 9(1)(vii)(b), as they were for earning income from a source outside India. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) was deemed unwarranted and ordered to be deleted. Transactions with Carnegie Mellon University, Call Centre School LLC, APM Group, British Computer Society, RADTAC, and an individual for professional services were similarly analyzed and disallowances were overturned, citing legal provisions and tax residency status. The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in all instances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
