Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involved reimbursement of expenses u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, concerning payments made for services rendered outside India. The payments to various entities were found to fall under exclusionary provisions of Section 9(1)(vii)(b), as they were for earning income from a source outside India. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) was deemed unwarranted and ordered to be deleted. Transactions with Carnegie Mellon University, Call Centre School LLC, APM Group, British Computer Society, RADTAC, and an individual for professional services were similarly analyzed and disallowances were overturned, citing legal provisions and tax residency status. The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in all instances.
The case involved reimbursement of expenses u/s 195 of the Income Tax Act, concerning payments made for services rendered outside India. The payments to various entities were found to fall under exclusionary provisions of Section 9(1)(vii)(b), as they were for earning income from a source outside India. Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) was deemed unwarranted and ordered to be deleted. Transactions with Carnegie Mellon University, Call Centre School LLC, APM Group, British Computer Society, RADTAC, and an individual for professional services were similarly analyzed and disallowances were overturned, citing legal provisions and tax residency status. The ITAT allowed the appeals of the assessee in all instances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
