Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 8, 2024Case LawsAT
Application u/s 7 dismissed without arguments addressed. Tribunal failed to adhere to the principle of hearing both parties before condemning. Order set aside, matter remanded for decision after due process. Application u/ss 60(5), 65, and 75 dismissed pre-admission of Section 7 application. Precedents establish Section 65 filing post-Sections 7, 9, or 10 without admission. Tribunal's dismissal solely on pre-admission filing unjustified. Order overturned, matter referred back for lawful consideration. NCLAT referred to as Appellate Tribunal.
Application u/s 7 dismissed without arguments addressed. Tribunal failed to adhere to the principle of hearing both parties before condemning. Order set aside, matter remanded for decision after due process. Application u/ss 60(5), 65, and 75 dismissed pre-admission of Section 7 application. Precedents establish Section 65 filing post-Sections 7, 9, or 10 without admission. Tribunal's dismissal solely on pre-admission filing unjustified. Order overturned, matter referred back for lawful consideration. NCLAT referred to as Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.