Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The case involves a dispute regarding the dishonour of cheques u/s 138 of the N.I. Act. The petitioner claimed to have sold 5 acres of land for Rs. 7.75 Crores, with contradictions on the execution of the Sale Deed. The respondent denied the Sale Deed's authenticity, requiring proof. The High Court held that the complaint prima facie discloses an offence, citing the burden of proving the absence of debt or liability. The petitioner's admission to issuing cheques and lack of challenge to summoning orders led to dismissal of the petition, as no prima facie case was found.
The case involves a dispute regarding the dishonour of cheques u/s 138 of the N.I. Act. The petitioner claimed to have sold 5 acres of land for Rs. 7.75 Crores, with contradictions on the execution of the Sale Deed. The respondent denied the Sale Deed's authenticity, requiring proof. The High Court held that the complaint prima facie discloses an offence, citing the burden of proving the absence of debt or liability. The petitioner's admission to issuing cheques and lack of challenge to summoning orders led to dismissal of the petition, as no prima facie case was found.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
