Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liability to pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) for intra-state and interstate delivery of electrical energy. The applicant questioned if they could claim CGST and SGST paid during the procurement of a solar power plant as input tax credit towards their GST liability. The ruling found that since the applicant invoiced only for the supply of electricity without including delivery charges, which are exempt from tax, they were not liable to pay GST on both intra-state and interstate deliveries. Additionally, as their output supplies were tax-exempt, they were not eligible to claim input tax credit on their inward supplies such as the solar power plant under relevant tax provisions.
Liability to pay Goods and Services Tax (GST) for intra-state and interstate delivery of electrical energy. The applicant questioned if they could claim CGST and SGST paid during the procurement of a solar power plant as input tax credit towards their GST liability. The ruling found that since the applicant invoiced only for the supply of electricity without including delivery charges, which are exempt from tax, they were not liable to pay GST on both intra-state and interstate deliveries. Additionally, as their output supplies were tax-exempt, they were not eligible to claim input tax credit on their inward supplies such as the solar power plant under relevant tax provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
