Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The District Inspector of Schools wrongly deducted income tax at 30% from arrears paid on salary due to a misunderstanding of tax rates. Finance and Accounts Officer claimed the error was due to misinterpretation and clarified her role as advisory. High Court found the conduct vindictive and indicative of incompetence, directing an inquiry by Additional Chief Secretary. High Court also ordered the Director of Education to explain the delay and consider awarding interest to the petitioner. The case is scheduled for the week commencing 02.09.2024.
The District Inspector of Schools wrongly deducted income tax at 30% from arrears paid on salary due to a misunderstanding of tax rates. Finance and Accounts Officer claimed the error was due to misinterpretation and clarified her role as advisory. High Court found the conduct vindictive and indicative of incompetence, directing an inquiry by Additional Chief Secretary. High Court also ordered the Director of Education to explain the delay and consider awarding interest to the petitioner. The case is scheduled for the week commencing 02.09.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
