Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee contended cash was received to meet urgent expenses at project site when funds were unavailable - argument that cash loans from directors were exempt from sections 269SS and 269T rejected as no such exception exists in statute - limitation argument rejected as proceedings completed within statutory limit - delay due to COVID-19 pandemic excluded - penalty levy inappropriate given assessee's business requiring frequent expenditure at distant project site and possibility of cash loans from directors due to exigency - appeals allowed by deleting penalties.
Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee contended cash was received to meet urgent expenses at project site when funds were unavailable - argument that cash loans from directors were exempt from sections 269SS and 269T rejected as no such exception exists in statute - limitation argument rejected as proceedings completed within statutory limit - delay due to COVID-19 pandemic excluded - penalty levy inappropriate given assessee's business requiring frequent expenditure at distant project site and possibility of cash loans from directors due to exigency - appeals allowed by deleting penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
