Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee contended cash was received to meet urgent expenses at project site when funds were unavailable - argument that cash loans from directors were exempt from sections 269SS and 269T rejected as no such exception exists in statute - limitation argument rejected as proceedings completed within statutory limit - delay due to COVID-19 pandemic excluded - penalty levy inappropriate given assessee's business requiring frequent expenditure at distant project site and possibility of cash loans from directors due to exigency - appeals allowed by deleting penalties.
Levy of penalty u/ss 271D and 271E was challenged - default u/ss 269SS and 269T - assessee received and repaid cash loans from directors and related concerns - assessee contended cash was received to meet urgent expenses at project site when funds were unavailable - argument that cash loans from directors were exempt from sections 269SS and 269T rejected as no such exception exists in statute - limitation argument rejected as proceedings completed within statutory limit - delay due to COVID-19 pandemic excluded - penalty levy inappropriate given assessee's business requiring frequent expenditure at distant project site and possibility of cash loans from directors due to exigency - appeals allowed by deleting penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.