Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2161 to 2180 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was not valid as the Revenue Audit Report merely pointed out discrepancy in computation method and opined on applicability of Section 50C, which is an interpretation of law and not 'information' required for reopening. The Assessing Officer's reasons recorded for reopening showed lack of reason to believe income escaped assessment, being mere reason to suspect based on change of opinion. Section 50C was held inapplicable to sale after conversion of capital asset into stock-in-trade, following precedents. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was not valid as the Revenue Audit Report merely pointed out discrepancy in computation method and opined on applicability of Section 50C, which is an interpretation of law and not 'information' required for reopening. The Assessing Officer's reasons recorded for reopening showed lack of reason to believe income escaped assessment, being mere reason to suspect based on change of opinion. Section 50C was held inapplicable to sale after conversion of capital asset into stock-in-trade, following precedents. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.