Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Corpus donations, being distinct from incomes derived from trust property, are granted exemption separately u/s 11(1)(a) and 11(1)(d) of the Act. There is no overlapping exemption. Different incomes recognized for exemption have been separately granted exemption. Corpus donations cannot claim exemption under both sub-clauses (d) and (a) of Section 11(1). The assessee was unable to point out any infirmity in this interpretation during the hearing before the Appellate Tribunal. The decisions relied upon by the assessee were either distinguishable on facts or rendered without considering the clear provision of law. The assessee's appeal seeking exemption u/s 11(1)(a) for corpus donations received was dismissed.
Corpus donations, being distinct from incomes derived from trust property, are granted exemption separately u/s 11(1)(a) and 11(1)(d) of the Act. There is no overlapping exemption. Different incomes recognized for exemption have been separately granted exemption. Corpus donations cannot claim exemption under both sub-clauses (d) and (a) of Section 11(1). The assessee was unable to point out any infirmity in this interpretation during the hearing before the Appellate Tribunal. The decisions relied upon by the assessee were either distinguishable on facts or rendered without considering the clear provision of law. The assessee's appeal seeking exemption u/s 11(1)(a) for corpus donations received was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
