Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
Tribunal held that cost of facilities provided by service recipient to Central Industrial Security Force for rendering security services, such as barrack accommodation, medical expenses, lease accommodation, telephone charges, vehicle hiring, stationery, miscellaneous expenses, is not includible in gross value for service tax u/s 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Relying on Supreme Court's decision in Bhayana Builders, Tribunal ruled that free supplies do not form part of total value for service tax. Consequently, demand of service tax on such facilities was set aside.
Tribunal held that cost of facilities provided by service recipient to Central Industrial Security Force for rendering security services, such as barrack accommodation, medical expenses, lease accommodation, telephone charges, vehicle hiring, stationery, miscellaneous expenses, is not includible in gross value for service tax u/s 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Relying on Supreme Court's decision in Bhayana Builders, Tribunal ruled that free supplies do not form part of total value for service tax. Consequently, demand of service tax on such facilities was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.