Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Tribunal held that cost of facilities provided by service recipient to Central Industrial Security Force for rendering security services, such as barrack accommodation, medical expenses, lease accommodation, telephone charges, vehicle hiring, stationery, miscellaneous expenses, is not includible in gross value for service tax u/s 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Relying on Supreme Court's decision in Bhayana Builders, Tribunal ruled that free supplies do not form part of total value for service tax. Consequently, demand of service tax on such facilities was set aside.
Tribunal held that cost of facilities provided by service recipient to Central Industrial Security Force for rendering security services, such as barrack accommodation, medical expenses, lease accommodation, telephone charges, vehicle hiring, stationery, miscellaneous expenses, is not includible in gross value for service tax u/s 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Relying on Supreme Court's decision in Bhayana Builders, Tribunal ruled that free supplies do not form part of total value for service tax. Consequently, demand of service tax on such facilities was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.