Purposive interpretation of residential house exemption: unregistered purchase agreement alone does not defeat relief, but investment must be verified...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3041 to 3060 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Tribunal held that cost of facilities provided by service recipient to Central Industrial Security Force for rendering security services, such as barrack accommodation, medical expenses, lease accommodation, telephone charges, vehicle hiring, stationery, miscellaneous expenses, is not includible in gross value for service tax u/s 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Relying on Supreme Court's decision in Bhayana Builders, Tribunal ruled that free supplies do not form part of total value for service tax. Consequently, demand of service tax on such facilities was set aside.
Tribunal held that cost of facilities provided by service recipient to Central Industrial Security Force for rendering security services, such as barrack accommodation, medical expenses, lease accommodation, telephone charges, vehicle hiring, stationery, miscellaneous expenses, is not includible in gross value for service tax u/s 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Relying on Supreme Court's decision in Bhayana Builders, Tribunal ruled that free supplies do not form part of total value for service tax. Consequently, demand of service tax on such facilities was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
