Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Petition challenging assessment order and consequential bank attachment was allowed. Impugned order imposing tax liability on allegation of sale suppression based on purchase-outward supply value difference was set aside. Petitioner claimed unawareness of proceedings due to non-receipt of show cause notice. Considering petitioner's assertion and nature of confirmed tax proposal, reconsideration warranted by remitting 5% of disputed tax demand within two weeks and submitting reply to show cause notice within said period. Petition disposed of.
Petition challenging assessment order and consequential bank attachment was allowed. Impugned order imposing tax liability on allegation of sale suppression based on purchase-outward supply value difference was set aside. Petitioner claimed unawareness of proceedings due to non-receipt of show cause notice. Considering petitioner's assertion and nature of confirmed tax proposal, reconsideration warranted by remitting 5% of disputed tax demand within two weeks and submitting reply to show cause notice within said period. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
