Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Petition challenging assessment order and consequential bank attachment was allowed. Impugned order imposing tax liability on allegation of sale suppression based on purchase-outward supply value difference was set aside. Petitioner claimed unawareness of proceedings due to non-receipt of show cause notice. Considering petitioner's assertion and nature of confirmed tax proposal, reconsideration warranted by remitting 5% of disputed tax demand within two weeks and submitting reply to show cause notice within said period. Petition disposed of.
Petition challenging assessment order and consequential bank attachment was allowed. Impugned order imposing tax liability on allegation of sale suppression based on purchase-outward supply value difference was set aside. Petitioner claimed unawareness of proceedings due to non-receipt of show cause notice. Considering petitioner's assertion and nature of confirmed tax proposal, reconsideration warranted by remitting 5% of disputed tax demand within two weeks and submitting reply to show cause notice within said period. Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
