Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Regarding capital gain on sale of flats, the ITAT held that for gift transactions, capital gain is not taxable at the time of gift, but is brought to tax when the gifted asset is subsequently transferred by adopting the date and cost of acquisition of the previous owner. For indexation benefit, the index cost will be taken from the previous year in which the previous owner had acquired the property. Regarding swapping of two units for one unit, the ITAT held that the builder-buyer agreement was not a fresh allotment or an exchange deed, but a redefinition of existing rights. The date of acquisition should be reckoned from the date of original allotment, and not the subsequent agreement. Therefore, the income cannot be treated as short-term capital gain. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Regarding capital gain on sale of flats, the ITAT held that for gift transactions, capital gain is not taxable at the time of gift, but is brought to tax when the gifted asset is subsequently transferred by adopting the date and cost of acquisition of the previous owner. For indexation benefit, the index cost will be taken from the previous year in which the previous owner had acquired the property. Regarding swapping of two units for one unit, the ITAT held that the builder-buyer agreement was not a fresh allotment or an exchange deed, but a redefinition of existing rights. The date of acquisition should be reckoned from the date of original allotment, and not the subsequent agreement. Therefore, the income cannot be treated as short-term capital gain. The assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.