Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The appellants made the payment on 25.08.2020 under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS). The dispute was whether this payment would entitle them to discharge obligations under SVLDRS and avail amnesty from interest and penalty. The CESTAT held that the appellants were trying to pay before 30.06.2020, but faced technical glitches. The Department was exploring possibilities to extend the scheme for those issued SVLDRS-3 before 30.06.2020 but couldn't pay. The Supreme Court had extended limitation periods due to the pandemic. The Madras High Court held that the time limit for SVLDRS payment was extended till 30.09.2020. Since the appellants discharged their liability within this permissible time, they were entitled to a discharge certificate under SVLDRS-4, without interest or penalty. The appeal was allowed.
The appellants made the payment on 25.08.2020 under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS). The dispute was whether this payment would entitle them to discharge obligations under SVLDRS and avail amnesty from interest and penalty. The CESTAT held that the appellants were trying to pay before 30.06.2020, but faced technical glitches. The Department was exploring possibilities to extend the scheme for those issued SVLDRS-3 before 30.06.2020 but couldn't pay. The Supreme Court had extended limitation periods due to the pandemic. The Madras High Court held that the time limit for SVLDRS payment was extended till 30.09.2020. Since the appellants discharged their liability within this permissible time, they were entitled to a discharge certificate under SVLDRS-4, without interest or penalty. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
