Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Petitioners did not make required pre-deposit for maintaining appeal - appeal initially filed belatedly, defective and rejected without merits - subsequent appeal filed with pre-deposit also belated - no lack of bona fide - petitioners already paid over 11% of disputed tax, more than required for appeal - matter remanded to appellate authority for decision on merits as substantial compliance with pre-deposit.
Petitioners did not make required pre-deposit for maintaining appeal - appeal initially filed belatedly, defective and rejected without merits - subsequent appeal filed with pre-deposit also belated - no lack of bona fide - petitioners already paid over 11% of disputed tax, more than required for appeal - matter remanded to appellate authority for decision on merits as substantial compliance with pre-deposit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.