Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Petitioners did not make required pre-deposit for maintaining appeal - appeal initially filed belatedly, defective and rejected without merits - subsequent appeal filed with pre-deposit also belated - no lack of bona fide - petitioners already paid over 11% of disputed tax, more than required for appeal - matter remanded to appellate authority for decision on merits as substantial compliance with pre-deposit.
Petitioners did not make required pre-deposit for maintaining appeal - appeal initially filed belatedly, defective and rejected without merits - subsequent appeal filed with pre-deposit also belated - no lack of bona fide - petitioners already paid over 11% of disputed tax, more than required for appeal - matter remanded to appellate authority for decision on merits as substantial compliance with pre-deposit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
