Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Mechanical approval under search assessment law vitiates assessments when sanction lacks application of mind; retrospective curative provision cannot ...
Petitioner failed to substantiate Input Tax Credit claim due to lack of supplier certificates. Discrepancy noted between Input Tax Credit availed in GSTR 3B and auto-populated in GSTR 2A. Electronic Credit Ledger balance after adjustment indicates inadequate explanation. Petitioner's credit tax position appears incorrect, unable to avail claimed IGST amount under CGST and SGST credit. Court grants temporary relief, staying recovery proceedings for three months, allowing petitioner to file revision petition u/s 161 within 30 days. Petition disposed.
Petitioner failed to substantiate Input Tax Credit claim due to lack of supplier certificates. Discrepancy noted between Input Tax Credit availed in GSTR 3B and auto-populated in GSTR 2A. Electronic Credit Ledger balance after adjustment indicates inadequate explanation. Petitioner's credit tax position appears incorrect, unable to avail claimed IGST amount under CGST and SGST credit. Court grants temporary relief, staying recovery proceedings for three months, allowing petitioner to file revision petition u/s 161 within 30 days. Petition disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
