Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO sought to reopen assessment on the ground that the remaining 80% required verification. The High Court held that since the issue of sundry creditors was considered during the regular assessment, the AO cannot reopen assessment on the same issue as it would amount to a change of opinion. Further, the matter of 20% disallowance is pending before the CIT(Appeals), and the AO cannot reopen assessment on the remaining 80% due to the principle of merger. Mere audit objection cannot be the basis for reopening assessment. The petition was allowed, quashing the reopening notice u/s 148.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO sought to reopen assessment on the ground that the remaining 80% required verification. The High Court held that since the issue of sundry creditors was considered during the regular assessment, the AO cannot reopen assessment on the same issue as it would amount to a change of opinion. Further, the matter of 20% disallowance is pending before the CIT(Appeals), and the AO cannot reopen assessment on the remaining 80% due to the principle of merger. Mere audit objection cannot be the basis for reopening assessment. The petition was allowed, quashing the reopening notice u/s 148.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.