Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Disallowance of interest and financial expenses was not justified as the appellant paid interest and financial expenses to State Bank of India, Overseas Branch, Parliament Street, New Delhi, which was evident from the bank statement furnished. The disallowance of depreciation claimed was incorrect as depreciation is an allowance, not an expense, and the audited balance sheet and tax audit report revealed the claim of depreciation certified by the auditor. The AO should have verified the claim from the previous year's records. Depreciation allowed in earlier years on fixed assets should be allowed in the current year, except for additions during the year due to lack of details. The non-allowability of credit for brought forward losses/unabsorbed depreciation was incorrect as the assessee had shown brought forward losses/depreciation in returns filed from year to year, which should be allowed as per the Income Tax Act while calculating tax demand. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Disallowance of interest and financial expenses was not justified as the appellant paid interest and financial expenses to State Bank of India, Overseas Branch, Parliament Street, New Delhi, which was evident from the bank statement furnished. The disallowance of depreciation claimed was incorrect as depreciation is an allowance, not an expense, and the audited balance sheet and tax audit report revealed the claim of depreciation certified by the auditor. The AO should have verified the claim from the previous year's records. Depreciation allowed in earlier years on fixed assets should be allowed in the current year, except for additions during the year due to lack of details. The non-allowability of credit for brought forward losses/unabsorbed depreciation was incorrect as the assessee had shown brought forward losses/depreciation in returns filed from year to year, which should be allowed as per the Income Tax Act while calculating tax demand. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.