Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
In a case involving the imposition of a redemption fine and penalty, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that when goods are allowed for re-export, the adjudicating authorities do not have the power to impose any redemption fine, citing the precedent of HCL Hewlett Packard Ltd. versus Collector of Customs, Delhi. Consequently, the redemption fine imposed on the appellant was set aside. Regarding the penalty, the Tribunal found it to be excessive and reduced it to Rs. 1,00,000/-. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
In a case involving the imposition of a redemption fine and penalty, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that when goods are allowed for re-export, the adjudicating authorities do not have the power to impose any redemption fine, citing the precedent of HCL Hewlett Packard Ltd. versus Collector of Customs, Delhi. Consequently, the redemption fine imposed on the appellant was set aside. Regarding the penalty, the Tribunal found it to be excessive and reduced it to Rs. 1,00,000/-. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
