Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court held that the Revenue department's request for two months to pay interest on refunds delayed by the department itself was audacious, as public money is utilized for interest payments. The Court directed the department to calculate interest up to March 1, 2024, and pay the balance interest by that date, failing which contempt proceedings would be initiated for willful disobedience of the Court's orders, emphasizing the need to save public funds and comply with judicial directives promptly.
The High Court held that the Revenue department's request for two months to pay interest on refunds delayed by the department itself was audacious, as public money is utilized for interest payments. The Court directed the department to calculate interest up to March 1, 2024, and pay the balance interest by that date, failing which contempt proceedings would be initiated for willful disobedience of the Court's orders, emphasizing the need to save public funds and comply with judicial directives promptly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
