Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Refund claim time limitation was challenged - Appeal filed online on GST portal on 31.10.2022 within prescribed period as per Rule 108(1) of GST Rules - Order appealed against was uploaded on common portal, thus filing hard copy not required u/r 108(3) proviso - Even otherwise, hard copy filing merely procedural - Impugned order rejecting appeal set aside, appellate authority directed to receive and dispose appeal on merits.
Refund claim time limitation was challenged - Appeal filed online on GST portal on 31.10.2022 within prescribed period as per Rule 108(1) of GST Rules - Order appealed against was uploaded on common portal, thus filing hard copy not required u/r 108(3) proviso - Even otherwise, hard copy filing merely procedural - Impugned order rejecting appeal set aside, appellate authority directed to receive and dispose appeal on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.