Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim time limitation was challenged - Appeal filed online on GST portal on 31.10.2022 within prescribed period as per Rule 108(1) of GST Rules - Order appealed against was uploaded on common portal, thus filing hard copy not required u/r 108(3) proviso - Even otherwise, hard copy filing merely procedural - Impugned order rejecting appeal set aside, appellate authority directed to receive and dispose appeal on merits.
Refund claim time limitation was challenged - Appeal filed online on GST portal on 31.10.2022 within prescribed period as per Rule 108(1) of GST Rules - Order appealed against was uploaded on common portal, thus filing hard copy not required u/r 108(3) proviso - Even otherwise, hard copy filing merely procedural - Impugned order rejecting appeal set aside, appellate authority directed to receive and dispose appeal on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.