Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim time limitation was challenged - Appeal filed online on GST portal on 31.10.2022 within prescribed period as per Rule 108(1) of GST Rules - Order appealed against was uploaded on common portal, thus filing hard copy not required u/r 108(3) proviso - Even otherwise, hard copy filing merely procedural - Impugned order rejecting appeal set aside, appellate authority directed to receive and dispose appeal on merits.
Refund claim time limitation was challenged - Appeal filed online on GST portal on 31.10.2022 within prescribed period as per Rule 108(1) of GST Rules - Order appealed against was uploaded on common portal, thus filing hard copy not required u/r 108(3) proviso - Even otherwise, hard copy filing merely procedural - Impugned order rejecting appeal set aside, appellate authority directed to receive and dispose appeal on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.