Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The petition is dismissed as an alternative efficacious remedy is available to challenge the impugned order u/s 107 of the GST Act. While violation of natural justice and vires of Section 16(2)(c) are grounds to entertain the writ, disputed questions of fact regarding opportunity of hearing and composite invocation of Section 16(2)(b) and 16(2)(c) necessitate thorough analysis, precluding interference at this stage. The petitioner can raise contentions on merits, including interpretation of Section 16(2)(b) read with Rule 36 and Section 155, before the Appellate Authority u/s 107.
The petition is dismissed as an alternative efficacious remedy is available to challenge the impugned order u/s 107 of the GST Act. While violation of natural justice and vires of Section 16(2)(c) are grounds to entertain the writ, disputed questions of fact regarding opportunity of hearing and composite invocation of Section 16(2)(b) and 16(2)(c) necessitate thorough analysis, precluding interference at this stage. The petitioner can raise contentions on merits, including interpretation of Section 16(2)(b) read with Rule 36 and Section 155, before the Appellate Authority u/s 107.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4800
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
