Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
The petition is dismissed as an alternative efficacious remedy is available to challenge the impugned order u/s 107 of the GST Act. While violation of natural justice and vires of Section 16(2)(c) are grounds to entertain the writ, disputed questions of fact regarding opportunity of hearing and composite invocation of Section 16(2)(b) and 16(2)(c) necessitate thorough analysis, precluding interference at this stage. The petitioner can raise contentions on merits, including interpretation of Section 16(2)(b) read with Rule 36 and Section 155, before the Appellate Authority u/s 107.
The petition is dismissed as an alternative efficacious remedy is available to challenge the impugned order u/s 107 of the GST Act. While violation of natural justice and vires of Section 16(2)(c) are grounds to entertain the writ, disputed questions of fact regarding opportunity of hearing and composite invocation of Section 16(2)(b) and 16(2)(c) necessitate thorough analysis, precluding interference at this stage. The petitioner can raise contentions on merits, including interpretation of Section 16(2)(b) read with Rule 36 and Section 155, before the Appellate Authority u/s 107.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
