Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Reassessment proceedings u/s 148 were sought to be undertaken more than three years after the end of the relevant Assessment Year. Sanction was required to be granted u/s 151(ii) of the Act since the period exceeded three years. However, the sanction was granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-3, who was not the specified authority empowered u/s 151(ii). Section 151 contains an inherent check and balance, requiring application of mind by more senior authorities when reopening is initiated after a longer period. Since the sanction was not granted by the authority having jurisdiction u/s 151(ii), the High Court disposed of the petition on this ground without expressing any opinion on other facets of law and issues raised.
Reassessment proceedings u/s 148 were sought to be undertaken more than three years after the end of the relevant Assessment Year. Sanction was required to be granted u/s 151(ii) of the Act since the period exceeded three years. However, the sanction was granted by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax-3, who was not the specified authority empowered u/s 151(ii). Section 151 contains an inherent check and balance, requiring application of mind by more senior authorities when reopening is initiated after a longer period. Since the sanction was not granted by the authority having jurisdiction u/s 151(ii), the High Court disposed of the petition on this ground without expressing any opinion on other facets of law and issues raised.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.