Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The reopening of assessment u/s 147 cannot be sustained as the exemption u/s 11 was wrongly denied. The notice claimed the petitioner engaged in commercial activities, rendering it ineligible for exemption. However, the Supreme Court's ruling in Yogiraj Charity Trust case clarified that if the primary purpose of a trust is charitable, an ancillary non-charitable object would not invalidate its charitable nature. The trust deed did not confer uncontrolled discretion to the trustees to engage in commercial activities. Mere receipts from charitable activities do not constitute income from commercial activities. There must be tangible material to conclude income escaped assessment to reopen the case. The reasons for reopening lacked application of mind, erroneously citing a non-existent assessment order and misattributing a Supreme Court judgment. The case was decided in favor of the assessee.
The reopening of assessment u/s 147 cannot be sustained as the exemption u/s 11 was wrongly denied. The notice claimed the petitioner engaged in commercial activities, rendering it ineligible for exemption. However, the Supreme Court's ruling in Yogiraj Charity Trust case clarified that if the primary purpose of a trust is charitable, an ancillary non-charitable object would not invalidate its charitable nature. The trust deed did not confer uncontrolled discretion to the trustees to engage in commercial activities. Mere receipts from charitable activities do not constitute income from commercial activities. There must be tangible material to conclude income escaped assessment to reopen the case. The reasons for reopening lacked application of mind, erroneously citing a non-existent assessment order and misattributing a Supreme Court judgment. The case was decided in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.