Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Sanction of specified authority u/s 151(1) is a condition precedent for issuing notice u/s 148 if the period of four years has elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year. In the present case, the notice u/s 148 was issued on 28.03.2014 for the assessment year 2007-08, and the sanction was obtained from the Joint Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner as mandated by section 151. The failure to obtain prior permission from the appropriate authority as required by the statute vitiates the notice u/s 148. Such defect is not curable u/s 292B. The issue of notice u/s 148 is bad in law.
Sanction of specified authority u/s 151(1) is a condition precedent for issuing notice u/s 148 if the period of four years has elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year. In the present case, the notice u/s 148 was issued on 28.03.2014 for the assessment year 2007-08, and the sanction was obtained from the Joint Commissioner instead of the Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner or Principal Commissioner or Commissioner as mandated by section 151. The failure to obtain prior permission from the appropriate authority as required by the statute vitiates the notice u/s 148. Such defect is not curable u/s 292B. The issue of notice u/s 148 is bad in law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.