Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Levy of penalty u/s 129(5) of GST Act for discrepancy between PIN code of petitioner in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill. Court held minor discrepancy in PIN code in GST Registration and Tax Invoices as minor violation of GST enactments. Difference in address in E-Way Bill and Tax Invoices due to Head Office and actual dispatch place. Petitioner earlier obtained VAT registration for dispatch place. Tax Invoices raised from same address. Imposition of penalty for technical breach or minor address variance in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill unjustified u/s 129(5). GST enactments aim to avoid unjust tax burden on assessee regularly paying tax and complying with law. Impugned order quashed. Respondent directed to refund amount paid or allow credit adjustment towards future tax liability.
Levy of penalty u/s 129(5) of GST Act for discrepancy between PIN code of petitioner in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill. Court held minor discrepancy in PIN code in GST Registration and Tax Invoices as minor violation of GST enactments. Difference in address in E-Way Bill and Tax Invoices due to Head Office and actual dispatch place. Petitioner earlier obtained VAT registration for dispatch place. Tax Invoices raised from same address. Imposition of penalty for technical breach or minor address variance in Tax Invoices and E-Way Bill unjustified u/s 129(5). GST enactments aim to avoid unjust tax burden on assessee regularly paying tax and complying with law. Impugned order quashed. Respondent directed to refund amount paid or allow credit adjustment towards future tax liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
