Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Merely deriving information through faceless scheme u/s 135A cannot create arbitrary consequences. Safeguards are needed to prevent defective information leading to Section 148 notice. Not all information u/s 135A is sacrosanct or defect-free. Once defect is pointed out, AO must consider assessee's version before issuing Section 148 notice. AO failed to verify correctness of electronic information with assessee's explanation before issuing impugned Section 148 notice. AO needs to apply mind, verify materials, and form opinion before dispensing with Section 148A procedure for Section 148 notice based on Section 135A information. Impugned Section 148 notice quashed for non-application of mind and being arbitrary.
Merely deriving information through faceless scheme u/s 135A cannot create arbitrary consequences. Safeguards are needed to prevent defective information leading to Section 148 notice. Not all information u/s 135A is sacrosanct or defect-free. Once defect is pointed out, AO must consider assessee's version before issuing Section 148 notice. AO failed to verify correctness of electronic information with assessee's explanation before issuing impugned Section 148 notice. AO needs to apply mind, verify materials, and form opinion before dispensing with Section 148A procedure for Section 148 notice based on Section 135A information. Impugned Section 148 notice quashed for non-application of mind and being arbitrary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.