Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The Central Government is empowered to formulate and amend the Foreign Trade Policy. The impugned Notification prohibiting export of Non-Basmati White Rice, except in certain cases, cannot be held contrary to the Foreign Trade Policy. The policy change can be given retrospective effect in public interest, overriding individual losses, as held in Shrijee Sales Corporation and Unicorn Industries cases. The petitioners' claim of vested rights due to prior Letters of Credit is rejected, as they were at the procurement stage, not shipment stage. The conditions in the Notification enabling exports for fulfilled contractual obligations are not arbitrary or violative of Article 14. The doctrine of legitimate expectation cannot be upheld per the Supreme Court's decision in Sivanandan CT case, as legitimate expectation is not a legal right and yields to public interest. No prior notice is required. The Notification will have prospective effect for the petitioners, allowing exports of Non-Basmati White Rice against Letters of Credit issued before 20.07.2023, fulfilling contractual obligations with foreign buyers.
The Central Government is empowered to formulate and amend the Foreign Trade Policy. The impugned Notification prohibiting export of Non-Basmati White Rice, except in certain cases, cannot be held contrary to the Foreign Trade Policy. The policy change can be given retrospective effect in public interest, overriding individual losses, as held in Shrijee Sales Corporation and Unicorn Industries cases. The petitioners' claim of vested rights due to prior Letters of Credit is rejected, as they were at the procurement stage, not shipment stage. The conditions in the Notification enabling exports for fulfilled contractual obligations are not arbitrary or violative of Article 14. The doctrine of legitimate expectation cannot be upheld per the Supreme Court's decision in Sivanandan CT case, as legitimate expectation is not a legal right and yields to public interest. No prior notice is required. The Notification will have prospective effect for the petitioners, allowing exports of Non-Basmati White Rice against Letters of Credit issued before 20.07.2023, fulfilling contractual obligations with foreign buyers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
