Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The court rejected the bail application u/s 45 of the PMLA, finding reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was involved in money laundering related to proceeds from the Mahadev Book App's online betting operations. The applicant admitted to being a hawala operator, receiving havala money from associates linked to the App's promoters. His jewellery shop hosted a party with the App's promoters. The court held there was prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in laundering proceeds of crime u/s 3 of the PMLA, and denying bail considering the risk of committing further offences.
The court rejected the bail application u/s 45 of the PMLA, finding reasonable grounds to believe the applicant was involved in money laundering related to proceeds from the Mahadev Book App's online betting operations. The applicant admitted to being a hawala operator, receiving havala money from associates linked to the App's promoters. His jewellery shop hosted a party with the App's promoters. The court held there was prima facie evidence of the applicant's involvement in laundering proceeds of crime u/s 3 of the PMLA, and denying bail considering the risk of committing further offences.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.