Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 125(1) of SVLDR Scheme disqualifies persons subjected to enquiry/investigation where duty involved was not quantified by 30.06.2019. Section 121(m) defines "enquiry/investigation" to include recording statements. Firm's representative's statement recorded on 06.07.2007 falls within this definition. However, twin conditions of enquiry/investigation and non-quantification before 30.06.2019 not satisfied as duty quantification formula prescribed by HC order. Hence, rejection of firm and partners' applications under SVLDR Scheme not justified, quashed and set aside. Petition allowed.
Section 125(1) of SVLDR Scheme disqualifies persons subjected to enquiry/investigation where duty involved was not quantified by 30.06.2019. Section 121(m) defines "enquiry/investigation" to include recording statements. Firm's representative's statement recorded on 06.07.2007 falls within this definition. However, twin conditions of enquiry/investigation and non-quantification before 30.06.2019 not satisfied as duty quantification formula prescribed by HC order. Hence, rejection of firm and partners' applications under SVLDR Scheme not justified, quashed and set aside. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.